fbpx

Archive for Writing

Step Aside Hero!

There’s been this trend recently.  I’ll go so far as to blame JMS (Babylon 5) for starting it, but I suspect it has it’s roots even deeper.

There’s been a long history in media (games, movies and TV) where the secondary characters are there simply to provide comedic relief.  Even in a show with an ensemble cast, you usually have two main characters.  They might start out as one set of characters, then shift as the fan favorites become clear, but generally you have just a few leads that are the bad*sses of every episode.  Even if they are in a story with a “specialist” (say, the bomb-squad guy) one or both of those heroes magically (sometimes by random chance, sometimes because they are just that bad*ss) can do the exact thing that will save the day.

But over the past, say, five years, the shows I’ve been keeping an eye on have been making EXCELLENT use of their secondary characters.  When someone is good at something, the writers are less protective of their heros.  The guy on the team who is a professional sniper gets to take the shot, the “hero” gets tasked with something else.  The background character who spent seven years hunting down child slavers in the Sudan knows what she is talking about when twenty-five kids show up half-dead in a cargo container.  The The “B-Team” is kicking some serious *ss, and the writers are letting them do it.

As a recent example, we have Fusco from Person of Interest.  Somewhat pudgy, seriously jaded, reasonably good a physical comedy, he was a dead-ringer for the “funny” guy.  And he does a fair pass at comedic relief every so often.  But most recently, with the more serious turn in the show, when Fusco does show up, there’s some seriousness involved.   Rather than devolving into a doughnut eating punchline, they’ve exposed a very hardcore cop over the course of multiple storylines.

It makes the show as a whole more interesting, not only because we have more characters that are worth our time, but it really strikes the core point of having an “ensemble” cast.  Every character has strengths and weaknesses, and as we learn what those are, it give the writer a new tool to work with.

Through a glass, darkly.

We have all seen it.  The lensing-effect that the internet has on any given topic.  Part of this is driven by our own natural tendency to seek out the things that interest us; LOLcats or Supermodels or TV actors or bad tattoos.  We don’t go to the internet to broaden our minds, we go to the internet to search for something specific, and in doing so, we FIND that something specific and move on.

But stacking on top of this are the tools of the internet itself.  Tools that are supposed to show up the things that we want.  Cookies get installed in your web-browser that only show ads related to the last commerce site you visited (I’ve been seeing only Eddie Bauer ads for the past three days now), news portals that look at your recent search history (looking at you HuffPo) and make suggestions based on the last few news items you’ve read (try it, go to a news site and look up an article on some superstar.  80% of the suggested articles will lead you to similar articles/information).  So it’s very easy to think that the things you are deliberately searching for are the top layer of the internet, the important things that *everybody* is interested in.

Stack another layer, the comments section/s or any given article or organization’s web-pages, on top of that and you can very quickly find yourself inside of a virtual echo-chamber, thoughts and ideas similar to yours being bounced back at you and reinforcing whatever you came in the metaphorical door with.

The internet-savvy, those who not only have been at this a while, but those who retain the presence of mind to observe this phenomenon as it is happening, are possibly less-affected (or trolls, I mean, they gotta come from somewhere, right).  But I find, more and more, that there is a large swath of the population that is unaware of this effect.  Which is a problem, because the tools in place are supposed to help us find what we are looking for (whether or not someone is making money off selling us what we are looking for is a different question) but instead they are isolating us, segregating us into Reds and Blues and Greens and Purples.

MIT took a look at this problem recently:

http://www.technologyreview.com/view/522111/how-to-burst-the-filter-bubble-that-protects-us-from-opposing-views/

But the solution isn’t such an easy thing to find.  Most people aren’t going to actively search out opposing opinions online (unless they are in the mood to start a fight, I suppose) and most companies are not going to direct you to content you might not want.  So this “bubble” as MIT refers to it, or “lens”, to take a page from Schell, is not going to go away on it’s own.

I feel that this is  one of those growing pains that comes with a new technology.  Like only getting the NYT delivered to your house would color your opinions based on the news delivered, this is a far tighter focus because those who post content are able to work within a tiny niche and still make money doing so.  For every topic or specialty out there, there is a website (usually multiple sites) that serves it.  So unless we find a way to make balancing viewpoints a profitable enterprise (both financially and intellectually) for those who use the web, this lensing effect can only get worse over time.