fbpx

Hall of mirrors…

 

I am and have been a lot of things in my life already.  Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy…  I’ve had the opportunity, and occasionally *taken* the opportunity to try things I would never have done had I been properly sane, and even the most tragic of accidents has proven to be the seed of something I could put to use in some capacity or another.  It’s odd now that I’m looking down the barrel of something that has always been a secret fear, except I am seeing it mirrored in the work of another artist.

Art, whether it be painted, digital, written, printed, typed, mixed in a test-tube or spun on a turntable is inherently referential.  When you create a piece, it is the sum of your experiences, the left hand twist to the brush you use because you learned to paint on a 3×5 palette in your lap, the irrepressible use of commas in your writing because that’s the cadence you hear in your head as you type.  You use blue because the ocean was blue the first time you slammed your surfboard into the rocks, or the rotting feel of green makes your teeth itch.  I like to follow the career of artists and writers.  I never buy the first in a series of books, I never look just at the most recent museum offering.  I am interested in the evolution over time, like reading Matt Wagner comics from the original Comico version of Grendel through Mage and into the Arielist.  You can watch the growth, the inclusion of experience as time goes by.  Sometimes it is the lightening of a black depression, sometime it is the revelation of life experience, but there is almost always a change.

One of things that I have always worried about is the degree of revelation, that more of me will show in a piece than I really want out there.  That someone will point and laugh and that will be the end, anything else the piece might have to say is lost.

All this is coming around to the fact that I just finished reading Elegy Beach, hard on the tail of actually getting to meet the author, Steven Boyett at the La Jolla Writer’s (www.lajollawritersconference.com/ljwc)  conference this past weekend.  For perhaps the first time ever, I got the opportunity to meet the voice behind the text.  And an interesting thing happened.  As I worked my way through the journey of our old and new cast members, there were moments, revelations when that voice, not the narrator, not character A or character B, but rather Boyett’s voice itself became evident and shone through.  It was an interesting look at something I had not taken into account in the evolution of a body of work, primarily because I haven’t had the chance to meet many of the creators of the works I fancy.

There had always been a bit of a buffer there, the supreme confidence that no one would *really* be able to see mirrors of me in my characters, that my experiences would translate through as an amalgam, rather than as a clear voice.  That I was just being paranoid (which is not at all uncommon) and that as long as I stayed at arms length, no one would ever really be able to see *me* in there.  But now I find myself looking though my pieces, both game related and written, looking for similarities to be excised.

La Jolla Writers Conference

I got to watch a changing of the guard this weekend.

It wasn’t really expected, not from this group of literary writers and
memoir novelists. I watched the the cult change masters from the tried
and true, the well known writing master to the shiny shiny up and
comer. Now, as analogies go, that’s probably not accurate, the up and
comer published his first novel 25 years ago, but the old school guy
has his publication date beat by an additional 30 years at least, so
we are talking relative values.

Friday afternoon, day one of the conference (www.lajollawritersconference.com/ljwc) is always a trifle slow.
It’s a Friday. You have to dance on the special edge of hard-core to
start a conference on a Friday afternoon, I don’t care if you’re a
retiree or work at the local Quick-ee Mart. It’s got to be your
passion, your compulsion that makes that happen. So on Friday there’s
prolly five of us in the room, always a choice situation because even
though this conference is adorably small, there is always a certain
amount of forwardness required which is, quite honestly, something hat
must be practises for us creative types. Interestingly enough, the
first lecture was on the craft of writing. Not about how to self-
publish and screw the man, not about how to rip down all the
conventions. He was talking about the art and craft of writing. And he
really knew his craft.

We’re not a bunch of neophytes here. This conference attracts the
experienced, the people who LOVE to read, love to write, not the
hedonistic percieved quality of being a writer but who love the
literality of sentence structure, love the purposeful aplication of
trigger words, the rhythm and flow of language as it pattrs onto the
page. Rookie mistakes are few and far between and arrogant F**ktards
need not apply.

As the conference moved into day 2, the crowd grew. At privious years
I had seen the same group of people in session after session listening
to the same writer of choice, and they began to show the same devotion
to the New Guy. The room filled up, people had to take the “cheap
seats” by the door to stand and listen. Thing is, the observations of
these two men, the old and the new were not so different. They both
ranted about the abuse of adverbs and cautioned about the seductive
death of the passive voice, the importance of that hook, the first
sentence that drags you into the second and the third. The paragraph
that makes the reader turn from the back-flap to the first page.

So why the attraction? I was watching the lure of the new, of a
classic message repackaged so that people who knew the lines by heart
were being inspired to listen afresh. By the end of the conference,
the new guys room was packed. Not just with the people lured in after
the had their fill of old favorites, but with the same people who had
shown up to hear him speak on day one, session one, they just kept
going back and while the material was retrod, the dynamic was not, the
way the group acted and interacted was different every time, because
each group was asking different questions, they were actively pushing
the session out of the bounds of the catalogue write-up. It really
drove home how powerful these small conferences can be, where you
don’t have to stand in line to shake the hand of someone you aspire to
stand alongside, you are not one of 400 people sitting in a university
sized lecture hall, waiting to be hand-fed snippets of wisdom form the
masters.

This is an interactive, irreproducible experience, the dynamic of the
group and the dynamic of the teacher/writer have the potential to feed
off one another and turn what started out as a classromm situation
into a true critique session, with questions and commentary from all
sides of the room and true feedback (not the snarky-ass stuff you may
have run across in College, but TRUE critique, given from someone who
is really, honestly giving you their opinion, not because THEY are
RIGHT, but because you made them feel something strongly enough for it
to bounce back at you).